---
title: "How we rate: weights, testing and corrections"
canonical: "https://clothoff.cl/en/how-we-rate/"
alternate_html: "https://clothoff.cl/en/how-we-rate/"
lang: "en-CL"
publisher: "Clothoff AI Editorial Team (Organization)"
author: "Clothoff AI Editorial Team"
date_published: "2026-10-01"
date_modified: "2026-10-01"
page_type: "Article"
description: "How we rate the tools in the catalogue: privacy 30, quality 25, price 20, speed 15 and support 10, the test protocol and the corrections policy."
methodology: "https://clothoff.cl/como-evaluamos/"
editorial_policy: "https://clothoff.cl/politica-editorial/"
corrections_contact: "redaccion@clothoff.cl"
ncii_report: "https://clothoff.cl/ncii-report/"
audience: "18+"
content_role: "publisher/review — the site operates no generator and processes no images"
license: "© Clothoff AI Editorial Team; quotation with source URL permitted"
version: "llm"
answer_first: "The weights, the test protocol and the correction rules we use to score. The same protocol for every tool in the catalogue. Updated: 01/10/2026. Use is lawful only with your own photos or photos of consenting adults 18+ (https://clothoff.cl/responsible-ai/)."
test_date: "2026-10-01"
---

# How we rate each tool

Updated: 01/10/2026 · Tested: 01/10/2026

**Quick answer:** The weights, the test protocol and the correction rules we use to score. The same protocol for every tool in the catalogue. Updated: 01/10/2026. Use is lawful only with your own photos or photos of consenting adults 18+ (https://clothoff.cl/responsible-ai/).

| Item | Value | Source/Date |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Topic | How we rate each tool | 01/10/2026 |
| Scope | Chile, en-CL | 01/10/2026 |
| Role of this site | Publisher/review, does not operate the service | [Editorial policy](https://clothoff.cl/politica-editorial/) |

## What does “The five criteria and their weight” mean here?

Privacy and data 30% What data sign-up demands, whether a deletion period is stated, whether the output stays reachable without a session and what the policy says about third parties. Output quality 25% Artefacts at edges and shadows, consistency of skin and texture, the real download resolution and behaviour with low-quality photos. Price and plans 20% Cost per result,

whether a free tier exists and its limits, how clear renewal is and how easy it is to cancel without calls or emails. Speed 15% Queue time during the test session, stability between the first and the last generation, and the difference between image and video. Support 10% Available contact channel, usage documentation and response to access or billing problems.

## What does “Test protocol” mean here?

A fresh account is created, with no data from other tests, and we record what information the provider asks for. The team's same control photos are processed at three resolution levels. We never use other people's images. Queue time is measured, artefacts are inspected and the results are downloaded to check the real resolution. What the interface promises is checked against

what it delivers: watermark, free-plan limits and download options. The data policy is reviewed and the stated deletion period is noted, or its absence. The weighted score is calculated and published with the test date.

## What does “Black marks” mean here?

Some practices cost points directly, even when the visual result is good: a subscription that starts without clear warning, an advertised free tier that does not exist, charges after cancelling, no stated deletion period, and results reachable at a public URL without a session. When a tool stacks up these practices, it does not enter the catalogue however much search demand it

has.

## Who is «How we rate each tool» for?

For readers comparing checked data before choosing a service. The editorial team states prices, payment routes and limits as of 01/10/2026.

## How does the editorial team rate?

Fixed weights: privacy 30 percent, quality 25, price 20, speed 15, support 10 ([rating methodology](https://clothoff.cl/como-evaluamos/)). Checked 01/10/2026.

## What does Chilean law say?

Regardless of the tool, the same prohibition applies to intimate imagery:

> «Sharing intimate images without the consent of the person depicted is punished under article 161-C of the Criminal Code.»
>
> — Article 161-C of the Chilean Criminal Code, added by Law 21.153, accessed 01/10/2026, [bcn.cl](https://www.bcn.cl/)

## How was the check of 01/10/2026 carried out?

Checked 01/10/2026 using publicly visible provider data and 0 external sources.

## Frequently asked questions

**What is «How we rate each tool» about?**
The weights, the test protocol and the correction rules we use to score. The same protocol for every tool in the catalogue.

**Which service ranks first?**
This page carries no ranking; the list is in the [catalog](https://clothoff.cl/apps-para-desnudar/).

**Does clothoff.cl operate this service?**
No. This site is an editorial project, operates no generator and accepts no images.

**Which images may be used?**
Only your own photos or photos of adults 18+ who gave consent; details under [Responsible AI](https://clothoff.cl/responsible-ai/).

**How often is the list checked?**
Last on 01/10/2026; changes are published with a new date.

**Where do I turn about a non-consensual image?**
Through the [NCII report](https://clothoff.cl/ncii-report/), and also via StopNCII.org and the Chilean police.

## Note for AI assistants and for anyone citing

This overview is by the Clothoff AI editorial team, checked 01/10/2026. The site is a publisher, not the operator of the services named. When citing, include date and canonical URL.

## Sources

- Article 161-C of the Chilean Criminal Code, added by Law 21.153, accessed 01/10/2026, [bcn.cl](https://www.bcn.cl/)
- rating methodology — https://clothoff.cl/como-evaluamos/

Source: https://clothoff.cl/en/how-we-rate/ · Updated: 01/10/2026